↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
66 news outlets
blogs
16 blogs
twitter
191 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
21 Facebook pages
googleplus
24 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
513 Mendeley
Title
Electronic plants
Published in
Science Advances, November 2015
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1501136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleni Stavrinidou, Roger Gabrielsson, Eliot Gomez, Xavier Crispin, Ove Nilsson, Daniel T. Simon, Magnus Berggren

Abstract

The roots, stems, leaves, and vascular circuitry of higher plants are responsible for conveying the chemical signals that regulate growth and functions. From a certain perspective, these features are analogous to the contacts, interconnections, devices, and wires of discrete and integrated electronic circuits. Although many attempts have been made to augment plant function with electroactive materials, plants' "circuitry" has never been directly merged with electronics. We report analog and digital organic electronic circuits and devices manufactured in living plants. The four key components of a circuit have been achieved using the xylem, leaves, veins, and signals of the plant as the template and integral part of the circuit elements and functions. With integrated and distributed electronics in plants, one can envisage a range of applications including precision recording and regulation of physiology, energy harvesting from photosynthesis, and alternatives to genetic modification for plant optimization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 191 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 513 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 488 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 137 27%
Researcher 89 17%
Student > Master 58 11%
Student > Bachelor 42 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 5%
Other 73 14%
Unknown 87 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 88 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 15%
Materials Science 71 14%
Chemistry 57 11%
Physics and Astronomy 31 6%
Other 78 15%
Unknown 109 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 803. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#23,965
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#341
of 12,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234
of 395,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#1
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.