↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
61 news outlets
blogs
16 blogs
twitter
212 tweeters
facebook
20 Facebook pages
googleplus
24 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
Title
Electronic plants
Published in
Science Advances, November 2015
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1501136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleni Stavrinidou, Roger Gabrielsson, Eliot Gomez, Xavier Crispin, Ove Nilsson, Daniel T. Simon, Magnus Berggren

Abstract

The roots, stems, leaves, and vascular circuitry of higher plants are responsible for conveying the chemical signals that regulate growth and functions. From a certain perspective, these features are analogous to the contacts, interconnections, devices, and wires of discrete and integrated electronic circuits. Although many attempts have been made to augment plant function with electroactive materials, plants' "circuitry" has never been directly merged with electronics. We report analog and digital organic electronic circuits and devices manufactured in living plants. The four key components of a circuit have been achieved using the xylem, leaves, veins, and signals of the plant as the template and integral part of the circuit elements and functions. With integrated and distributed electronics in plants, one can envisage a range of applications including precision recording and regulation of physiology, energy harvesting from photosynthesis, and alternatives to genetic modification for plant optimization.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 212 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 271 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 29%
Researcher 65 22%
Student > Master 44 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 4%
Other 60 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 22%
Engineering 60 20%
Materials Science 45 15%
Chemistry 35 12%
Physics and Astronomy 27 9%
Other 66 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 777. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,135
of 12,958,991 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#77
of 2,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178
of 352,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#1
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,958,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 124.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.