↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
47 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
63 X users
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
519 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Deposition, exhumation, and paleoclimate of an ancient lake deposit, Gale crater, Mars
Published in
Science, October 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aac7575
Pubmed ID
Authors

J P Grotzinger, S Gupta, M C Malin, D M Rubin, J Schieber, K Siebach, D Y Sumner, K M Stack, A R Vasavada, R E Arvidson, F Calef, L Edgar, W F Fischer, J A Grant, J Griffes, L C Kah, M P Lamb, K W Lewis, N Mangold, M E Minitti, M Palucis, M Rice, R M E Williams, R A Yingst, D Blake, D Blaney, P Conrad, J Crisp, W E Dietrich, G Dromart, K S Edgett, R C Ewing, R Gellert, J A Hurowitz, G Kocurek, P Mahaffy, M J McBride, S M McLennan, M Mischna, D Ming, R Milliken, H Newsom, D Oehler, T J Parker, D Vaniman, R C Wiens, S A Wilson

Abstract

The landforms of northern Gale crater on Mars expose thick sequences of sedimentary rocks. Based on images obtained by the Curiosity rover, we interpret these outcrops as evidence for past fluvial, deltaic, and lacustrine environments. Degradation of the crater wall and rim probably supplied these sediments, which advanced inward from the wall, infilling both the crater and an internal lake basin to a thickness of at least 75 meters. This intracrater lake system probably existed intermittently for thousands to millions of years, implying a relatively wet climate that supplied moisture to the crater rim and transported sediment via streams into the lake basin. The deposits in Gale crater were then exhumed, probably by wind-driven erosion, creating Aeolis Mons (Mount Sharp).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 376 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 24%
Researcher 57 15%
Student > Master 52 13%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 73 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 205 53%
Physics and Astronomy 39 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Environmental Science 12 3%
Engineering 11 3%
Other 23 6%
Unknown 82 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 474. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#59,949
of 26,375,498 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,250
of 83,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#650
of 291,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#25
of 1,355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.