↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Chemical feedbacks weaken the wintertime response of particulate sulfate and nitrate to emissions reductions over the eastern United States
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1803295115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Viral Shah, Lyatt Jaeglé, Joel A. Thornton, Felipe D. Lopez-Hilfiker, Ben H. Lee, Jason C. Schroder, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Jose L. Jimenez, Hongyu Guo, Amy P. Sullivan, Rodney J. Weber, Jaime R. Green, Marc N. Fiddler, Solomon Bililign, Teresa L. Campos, Meghan Stell, Andrew J. Weinheimer, Denise D. Montzka, Steven S. Brown

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 21%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Professor 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 16%
Chemistry 9 9%
Engineering 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#347,366
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6,283
of 103,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,377
of 343,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#117
of 954 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 954 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.