@TallentPhyllis @DAG23103560 @Topher_Lane @GavinNewsom It wasn't valid based on what opinion? Yours? As I stated you'd simply dismiss the information as invalid because you disagree with it. The CDC seemed to think it was valid enough to use it on multiple
@JohnRLottJr @smaceachern2 @_Jack_Graham_ @1DickCoughlan People will just lie, on the internet? https://t.co/3IzVKXafzT https://t.co/CUtl8GPSfE
RT @MsKerolynC: @jlounsbury59 This is a fairly rich resource: https://t.co/wy283rVbO4
@jlounsbury59 This is a fairly rich resource: https://t.co/wy283rVbO4
RT @dovgvlad: @wavesandmeans @schotts @AT20939504 @jle4psu @theliamnissan “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federa…
RT @dovgvlad: @wavesandmeans @schotts @AT20939504 @jle4psu @theliamnissan “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federa…
@wavesandmeans @schotts @AT20939504 @jle4psu @theliamnissan “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes.” -- National Research Council (2005) https://t.co/
Defensive use of guns are as common as offensive use. Many more innocent people would be victimized without legal carry. Unfortunate sign of the times. https://t.co/g0ieA1YSd4 I believe this study was commissioned by Obama administration.
@177lbsga1 @Someone4once @davidhogg111 Lololol I actually don’t have to here is some great work that already does: https://t.co/qQHmjB6bP8
@DerekPederson3 @wil_da_beast630 You might want to educate yourself a more before using words like “infinitesimal” re that phenomenon. It says a lot about your specific socio-cultural bubble. https://t.co/oUZKYOHBME
@ryelle62 @TimothyTobias2 @MrMayfieldUSA “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes.” -- National Research Council (2005) https://t.co/cEofrpk6CJ
@TrillTexan89 @CherokeeBlood10 @AndrewPollackFL Based on your thought process, you will agree with these stats too - that owning a gun neither increases nor decreases crime. In other words guns are a non-factor and are proven not to help at all with cri
@SusanHokanson @mittensgme21 @Coachhoove @Elex_Michaelson @GavinNewsom I am just telling you the reality. It is not always brandishing. Sometimes it is just verbally stating. https://t.co/GeAVu6TUWY https://t.co/b1A4c1RJjC https://t.co/2qi3LOitom https://t
@MotownGirl2018 @SaltteamS @POTUS “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes.” -- National Research Council (2005) https://t.co/cEofrpk6CJ
@TonyBarona1 @Weinsteinlaw Here’s a report you need. It’s one the experts use, not talking heads on TV or the web. The study shows that the introduction of guns into the community doesn’t do a thing for changing crime stats. They don’t move the needle
@frumoasa____ The National Academy of Sciences reviewed hundreds of studies and could not document a single gun regulation that reduced violent crime. Guns are used defensively more often than they’re used for violent crime. https://t.co/jrWjrFup9Q; https:
@Pwnitz https://t.co/knuQk8IuQk Here's some more commentary that references well over a dozen.
@spookychop @therealriggs32 @Mabinogion21 @AlteredAnglePB @stoolpresidente Actually, federal gun control such as the Federal Assault Weapons Ban had little effect on firearm homicide rates. Your CNN talking point has no basis in reality. https://t.co/QwM
@sconley00 @JoJoFromJerz @MarshaBlackburn Armed violence, #GunControl laws in Europe, by Country https://t.co/XC1cIbaosN Natl Research Council Committee to Improve Research Information & Data on Firearms https://t.co/m3seucMroa Library of Congress St
@LLPatriot4 @419Styer @Timcast Actually, it is the case. https://t.co/g7inzbX4Af https://t.co/h9ANSwMDk7 https://t.co/KwEYrE6Z1l
@BStinstin @primalpoly @jessesingal 2nd link: If the study referred to is Miller et al. (2002), the National Research Council found significant problems with this study. They found that using the same proxy for gun ownership yielded a negative association
@GordiesStitches @BMLewis2 @HaimishTheRed @OpieRadio Stats, eh? Ok here is one for you. The introduction of guns does not do anything at all for helping stop crime. They are a proven non-factor. We’ve known this for years. https://t.co/9DMyRBwgKE
@MikeLoychik If guns worked to fight crime, crime would have went down when they were added. But it didn’t, so they don’t. https://t.co/9DMyRBwgKE
@trulyfree1978 @griswold12 @DanRather This is a great one showing having firearms did not increase or decrease crime. It was a non-factor. https://t.co/9DMyRBwgKE
@_ScottieTheKid @TedTratt @ZaRdOz420WPN @TalksShane @Strandjunker It's not a claim I'm making, the studies have been done. At the request of the US government which is very biased TOWARDS gun control. https://t.co/IhsxHi7uek
@WOmalley11 @TedTratt @ZaRdOz420WPN @_ScottieTheKid @TalksShane @Strandjunker https://t.co/IhsxHi7uek Study done at the request of the CDC, who is VERY biased towards gun control. NEXT.
@johansenburg @TedTratt @ZaRdOz420WPN @_ScottieTheKid @TalksShane @Strandjunker https://t.co/IhsxHi7uek There this even explores some of the controversies over the survey methodology. Still almost always more defensive use than criminal use.
@ZiemniakKaren @howdidwehether1 @meganranney Did you know that adding a gun does nothing to stop crime? It’s proven statistically all the way back in 1996 and hasn’t changed. https://t.co/SWPxwgjbnZ
@ewarren @sciam The science is, in fact, not clear. https://t.co/2gALCr8LyX Common sense tells us that finding and supervising dangerous people is a better way to keep us say, than putting people in prison for not doing the right paperwork around guns. htt
@LikesBikes432 @AlGonq @Msgargoyle13 @60Minutes Concurrently, this report used by the experts shows where adding guns neither decreased or increased crime. Seems adding them really didn’t scare the bad guys away. https://t.co/9DMyRBwgKE
@IJustAte3 @Cougarfan40 @KayTha @jbf1755 https://t.co/c13nKJ45d9 https://t.co/2HSa2edmnk https://t.co/Or4Ops9Dq3 How many more do you want?
@NunoCavac0 @DakotaFitz4 @AngryinH @RoseRue5 Heller is the biggest mass murderer of all time. Kleck would be 2nd, with Lott coming up 3rd. Too bad the excuse of self defense with a gun is also debunked. Data proves having a gun makes absolutely NO differ
@NRAA1F @NRA https://t.co/9DMyRBwgKE The National Research Academies Panel which found guns don’t increase or decrease crime. Refresh if you get a paywall. It usually goes away.
@Eptresist The National Research Council repoted that an "evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes." See: "Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review" 2004. htt
@KuyuAnthony There was a National Academy of Science report on that issue that is a bit old now but still interesting (https://t.co/cxsdpNk25p), but mostly I formed this opinion after reading a lot of papers a few years ago, not any one thing in particular
@DeepBreathPeace Here’s the 2001 paper. These are not hard to find. https://t.co/xJb3H54vKk
@Sandbag_1 @JoeTurbie @OpieRadio I will close with this publication from 1996 by the National Research Academies Panel which found guns don’t increase or decrease crime. https://t.co/SWPxwgjJdx
@foimage https://t.co/8u4caVHyAG https://t.co/savpPSpLVW https://t.co/9sFqBHbwH6 Do you want more?
The National Academies of Sciences publish a report in 2005. /3 https://t.co/GU434JO2oE
@crazyredranting @Waltgar1 @ShananValles @BetoORourke Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review (2005). Chapter 5. https://t.co/c8YAw1FmHj
@imlike_mike @shotgun_shoes @LoganA_NBA @Cherry_Kushh @isaiahthomas The "study" hes quoting are by John Lott. A dude caught multiple times manipulating his data and hasn't had a single study of his peer reviewed. The closest one he got, didn't end up getti
@Tactical_review Here's one study, unfortunately, data has been intentionally obfuscated because it generally supports the position they don't like. https://t.co/eO5ry7DziH
@HistoryBoomer @jstevewhite @ThinkerAspiring Self-defense is also a lot easier with a gun, esp. for the old, small, and weak. Kleck and Gertz found ~2.5 million defensive gun uses/yr in the US. Replicated many times by others. How many DGUs become complete
Nope. Nobody said “all.” However, we do know that resisting with a gun has the best track record of preventing injury in the face of a robbery or assault, compared to other responses. https://t.co/xCHskBexZJ https://t.co/qeGEYMoVgP
@PaulSteveSamuel UK has also a massive knife problem (https://t.co/SpiCfFLcm7 ) That aside, research proves that UK's gun ban only made their gun problem worse (https://t.co/XIkh9zsNoX ) US has tried "Assault rifle" Gun bans and they have been found inne
@patrickbrophy You’re adorable. Here’s a thorough debunking and repudiation of Lott’s claims. https://t.co/Hsap3hqdc2
@mags2277 @jimriggins4 @MKronader @NBCNews Yeah it's called confirmation bias. You ignore everything I bring up because it doesn't agree with you and you see something that you agree with so must be true. Again there's enough citations we could keep going
@mags2277 @jimriggins4 @MKronader @NBCNews https://t.co/xFXMXi6EDi "A 2014 study found no impacts on homicide rates with an assault weapon ban." "A 2017 review found that there was no evidence that ban had a significant effect on firearm homicides" Stat
@BarryKaplanUSMC @RPX_XPR @iainjrobinson @sebastianbach “The study, which was farmed out by the CDC to the Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, also revealed the estimated number of defensive uses of guns ranges "from about 500,000 to more
@MikoMahan “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes.” -- National Research Council (2005) https://t.co/cEofrpk6CJ
Hell, my lever action .22 rifle takes 15. Also, the AWB didn't work. https://t.co/iin5Pv3J3q https://t.co/v59I9PuOQF https://t.co/29zny8QpbY https://t.co/BUqofEbodX
@JohnRLottJr @RWPUSA @UChicagoLaw National Research Council report found that the data did not support theory that RTC laws reduce violent crime: https://t.co/ewFekxU97H
@ABC “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes.” -- National Research Council (2005) https://t.co/cEofrpk6CJ
@daddyhominum “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes.” -- National Research Council (2005) https://t.co/cEofrpk6CJ
@Cat_MarqueeLV @TimothyTobias2 @Tashajmaa @ElieNYC “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes.” -- National Research Council (2005) https://t.co/cEofrpk6C
@sandnseaOR @armanikeksings @relscd @sk8rgothking “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes.” -- National Research Council (2005) https://t.co/cEofrpk6CJ
@thelibbiegrant @KenCox @MuellerSheWrote Feel free to read: https://t.co/oYbmDFQdKE
@Umbrella_France @niccorticchiato @Saebasan @BL71854341 @lemondefr @ARPAC_fr L'article wikipédia est parfaitement sourcé le rapport a été publié avec 18 experts https://t.co/GkoBkoJRGe
RT @ajnamdeplume: @revdrjanet @wh0967 @TonyPeric @AGRobBonta @SenateDems @HouseDemocrats #GunReformNow COMMITTEE TO IMPROVE RESEARCH INFO…
@revdrjanet @wh0967 @TonyPeric @AGRobBonta @SenateDems @HouseDemocrats #GunReformNow COMMITTEE TO IMPROVE RESEARCH INFORMATION AND DATA ON FIREARMS https://t.co/Q7ocCOtKYF Germany https://t.co/6XNzpHc5Hd https://t.co/GKGgpACb1u
RT @RealGunLobbyist: “Safe storage” laws don’t reduce rates of crime, suicide, or accidental death The National Research Council found tha…
RT @RealGunLobbyist: “Safe storage” laws don’t reduce rates of crime, suicide, or accidental death The National Research Council found tha…
“Safe storage” laws don’t reduce rates of crime, suicide, or accidental death The National Research Council found that some gun control policies may reduce suicide by gun, but do not reduce overall suicides These policies don’t save lives See:https://t.
5. Other countries with a high number of gun ownership have low crime rates as well, such as Canada and Switzerland. Source: https://t.co/2dphwrihjV
@LMissaster @Bluestocking66 @TimothyTobias2 @Sb5Holly @RepThomasMassie @SpeakerPelosi “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes.” -- National Research Co
@rowkesm @ChrisMurphyCT https://t.co/TpK84Rbg66 https://t.co/qds3A1MVce There's two, right off the Wikipedia page for the Federal AWB.
@Jim_Stewart61 @Jaden__Bellar @trisdouglas @HarrisonBecker7 @thefrogpryncess @No14Munson @POTUS “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes.” -- National R
@ShadowBannedUSA @prageru RTC means concealed carry https://t.co/wn75OFElPU https://t.co/BZ6ne4Ef5C
@Ito_OW @LauraWhitt32 @FreedomFritesUS @RAndrewCastel @madsmaru @DukeJeopardy Might want to check this out https://t.co/1bU3epiPVZ
@RandyRen4 @SmokeyMagma National Research Council https://t.co/C61gZytLhm
@EnragedApostate @hellcat_lady @CNN @cspan @cspanwj @MSNBC @FoxNews Here’s more (very long report): “A recent evaluation of the short-term effects of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes.” -- Nation
@typhusaurus @Sambacon25 @capeandcowell “The advisability of keeping a firearm in the home for protection must be questioned.” https://t.co/xsxDZcaPE0
The NRC’s summary of the research about firearms and suicide is succinctly stated in this quote from the report: “Overall, the U.S. studies have consistently found that household gun ownership is associated with a higher overall risk of suicide.” https://
@Alt_Rogue_ @mathison_connie Here. The PDF is free to download. https://t.co/cEofrpk6CJ
A study done by Dr. Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty of the Barb University says that “I be the baddie B, Barbie Tingz Banging body B, everybody be on my D Yo I gotta be in reality, suck a D if you doubted me”
@DrVickyHarris @reason Defensive use of firearms is pervasive and effective Trust the science! https://t.co/fPWCAb44WX
@TheUnTaxer Interesante leer lo que la academia analiza y concluye de su investigación https://t.co/6qah61MKzX
@mkolken @marcela_elisa "analyzed national government surveys involving more than 14,000 people..." it's the crime *victimization* survey, so it excludes those who weren't victims because they had a gun! https://t.co/iAzXPvUKYP https://t.co/7Ym6VdZq56
@SifuEdition @bonhomme37 @mjfree I put in the leg work for you the study: https://t.co/gVLnWNssnW the rebuttal: https://t.co/pEyhEp2EtR