↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 15,330)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
85 news outlets
blogs
15 blogs
twitter
770 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
8 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Investigating the running abilities of Tyrannosaurus rex using stress-constrained multibody dynamic analysis
Published in
PeerJ, July 2017
DOI 10.7717/peerj.3420
Pubmed ID
Authors

William I. Sellers, Stuart B. Pond, Charlotte A. Brassey, Philip L. Manning, Karl T. Bates

Abstract

The running ability of Tyrannosaurus rex has been intensively studied due to its relevance to interpretations of feeding behaviour and the biomechanics of scaling in giant predatory dinosaurs. Different studies using differing methodologies have produced a very wide range of top speed estimates and there is therefore a need to develop techniques that can improve these predictions. Here we present a new approach that combines two separate biomechanical techniques (multibody dynamic analysis and skeletal stress analysis) to demonstrate that true running gaits would probably lead to unacceptably high skeletal loads in T. rex. Combining these two approaches reduces the high-level of uncertainty in previous predictions associated with unknown soft tissue parameters in dinosaurs, and demonstrates that the relatively long limb segments of T. rex-long argued to indicate competent running ability-would actually have mechanically limited this species to walking gaits. Being limited to walking speeds contradicts arguments of high-speed pursuit predation for the largest bipedal dinosaurs like T. rex, and demonstrates the power of multiphysics approaches for locomotor reconstructions of extinct animals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 770 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Other 10 8%
Student > Master 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Engineering 6 5%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1348. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2023.
All research outputs
#9,706
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#13
of 15,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132
of 326,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#1
of 337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.