↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
47 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
64 X users
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
509 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
382 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Deposition, exhumation, and paleoclimate of an ancient lake deposit, Gale crater, Mars
Published in
Science, October 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aac7575
Pubmed ID
Authors

J P Grotzinger, S Gupta, M C Malin, D M Rubin, J Schieber, K Siebach, D Y Sumner, K M Stack, A R Vasavada, R E Arvidson, F Calef, L Edgar, W F Fischer, J A Grant, J Griffes, L C Kah, M P Lamb, K W Lewis, N Mangold, M E Minitti, M Palucis, M Rice, R M E Williams, R A Yingst, D Blake, D Blaney, P Conrad, J Crisp, W E Dietrich, G Dromart, K S Edgett, R C Ewing, R Gellert, J A Hurowitz, G Kocurek, P Mahaffy, M J McBride, S M McLennan, M Mischna, D Ming, R Milliken, H Newsom, D Oehler, T J Parker, D Vaniman, R C Wiens, S A Wilson

Abstract

The landforms of northern Gale crater on Mars expose thick sequences of sedimentary rocks. Based on images obtained by the Curiosity rover, we interpret these outcrops as evidence for past fluvial, deltaic, and lacustrine environments. Degradation of the crater wall and rim probably supplied these sediments, which advanced inward from the wall, infilling both the crater and an internal lake basin to a thickness of at least 75 meters. This intracrater lake system probably existed intermittently for thousands to millions of years, implying a relatively wet climate that supplied moisture to the crater rim and transported sediment via streams into the lake basin. The deposits in Gale crater were then exhumed, probably by wind-driven erosion, creating Aeolis Mons (Mount Sharp).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 371 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 24%
Researcher 56 15%
Student > Master 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 70 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 203 53%
Physics and Astronomy 39 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Environmental Science 11 3%
Engineering 11 3%
Other 24 6%
Unknown 79 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 474. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#57,220
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,180
of 83,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#635
of 291,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#25
of 1,355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.